Peer-to-peer pawnbroking

July 3rd, 2013

A new peer-to-peer company has launched called FundingSecure (not to be confused with Funding Secured) and this allows individuals to pawn assets to obtain a loan.  Here is what they say:

FundingSecure introduces savers who wish to achieve a high return with borrowers who wish to take out short-term loans using their assets as security.  FundingSecure provides an alternative way of lending providing security to savers and cheaper and faster loans to borrowers.

There are pawnbrokers around on every high street, but FundingSecure are the first peer-to-peer company to offer this service.  From the lenders perspective, this is not too dissimilar to existing P2P companies, except their funds are secured against an asset (valued at more than the loan), meaning that bad debt should be low.  There is currently a special offer of 0% fees for the first 12 months for new lenders.

Funding Circle change minimum lending rates

July 1st, 2013
Funding Circle

Funding Circle have made some amendments to their minimum lending rates.  The P2P money blog reported last week that the minimum lending rates had been increased from 4% to between 6% (for A+ borrowers) and 10.5% (for C borrowers).  Following 64 pages of comments on the Funding Circle forum, these have been amended to between 6% (for A+ borrowers) and 9% (for C borrowers).  In addition they have stated that future changes will have 2 weeks notice.

A skeptical lender could say that Funding Circle have done a U-turn, but it would be fairer to state that they have listened to feedback and made changes.  It was 12 months ago when lenders threatened strike action after a rate change on another P2P company, and a year later after failing to reverse their decision lending was down 90%.

Here is the full statement on the Funding Circle blog:

Last week we introduced a trial of new minimum bid rates by risk band. Prior to this change the minimum interest rate you could bid on a loan auction was 4% across all risk bands. This was increased on 24 June 2013 and you can read our blog post announcing this initial change here.

When deciding to increase the minimum bid rate, we take into consideration a range of factors. These include the cost of alternative borrowing products, the returns available on other investment products, the general economic conditions, protecting investors from bidding rates significantly below the average and the estimated bad debt rates for each risk band.

Since announcing the start of this trial, we have received valuable feedback from investors on the forum, and also through a survey sent out on Friday, which you can see the results of here. Regular feedback from investors and borrowers is crucial to the success of Funding Circle and we’d like to thank everyone who has taken part so far.

Following the feedback we will be adjusting the trial minimum bid rates to the following levels:

A+ risk band: 6.0%
A risk band: 7.0%
B risk band: 8.0%
C risk band: 9.0%

Going forward we are committed to reviewing minimum bid rates on a monthly basis and providing two weeks’ notice of any future changes. This will ensure investors are aware in advance of any changes and there is minimal impact on market behaviour or an individual’s investment experience. Additionally, any future adjustments will be introduced incrementally at a maximum of 0.5% (+ or -) of the existing minimum bid rates across each risk band.

Samir, our CEO, and other team members will be discussing the minimum bid rate trial on the forum, and the rationale behind the decisions we took. If you have specific questions or would like to discuss this in more detail, please post a question and we will be happy to answer.

Alternative finance

July 1st, 2013

There once was a time when building societies were regarded as the alternative to banks.  These were mutual organisations - owned by their members - where savers could get a decent return.  Over the last two decades, the number of building societies have fallen as some demutualised (became banks or were taken oven by banks).  The financial crisis of provided an opportunity for peer-to-peer companies, as borrowers found access to capital harder to come by as banks tried to preserve capitol.  As lots of cheap money became available to try to encourage banks to lend again, the rates on offer to savers fell still further.

Building societies are not what they once were, with a lot operating like banks in all but name.  I recently received the annual statement from one such building society, which had made yet another annual loss, yet the CEO received more than 10% rise in remuneration from the previous year.  It is no wonder that finance has become so unpopular with the general public.

Peer-to-peer lending does allow individuals to readdress the balance with borrowers getting a market leading interest rate, and lenders receiving a return greater than they can with their bank or building society - provided the understand the potential risks.

Peer-to-peer lending concept

June 27th, 2013

Folk2Folk is one of the latest companies to join the peer-to-peer arena, and is based in the South West of England.  They have published a useful document on peer-to-peer lending, which is worth republishing here, and gives us a mention too.

Peer-to-Peer Lending – a concept you are likely to hear much more of over the coming years

There are many good reasons why you would need to borrow money, such as to invest in a business, secure short-term funding or to refinance a  loan at a better rate of interest, to name but a few.  Two of the most popular avenues to borrow money are from a bank or from friends and family.

However, a third group is fast catching up – Peer-to-Peer lenders.  Peer-to-Peer lenders are everyday people who have money and wish to lend it, in return for a competitive rate of interest (usually between 6-12% pa).

There have been many peer-to-peer lending platforms set up over recent years and their popularity with both lenders and borrowers is increasing at quite an astonishing rate.

The Peer-to-Peer lending platforms make the process of introducing lenders and borrowers very simple and the platforms are often exclusively web based.  They take much of the administration away that borrowers experience with their high street bank.

The various platforms do differ and it can be confusing to know which platform a borrower or lender/investor should use. There are platforms that lend to individuals for their personal needs and those that lend only to businesses.  Some platforms require no security; others require personal guarantees or require borrowers to put forward property as security.  There are a few comparison websites such as, helping demystify the various platforms.

There are of course risks involved for those using Peer-to-Peer lending platforms as the industry at the moment is not regulated, although this is due to change in April 2014.  Many of the platforms are building in safeguards for lenders.  The various platforms claim to carefully vet borrowers by carrying out credit searches etc.

Lenders should be wary that the interest rates quoted often do not factor in the average default rate and the various platforms have different levels of default.  The headline interest rate is therefore not the only thing to consider.  Investors/ lenders should also consider the form of security being put forward by borrowers.  The form of security will likely alter the rate of recovery.

One peer-to-peer platform has focused on property finance in the South West and is applying a “local touch” by drawing upon local knowledge of the property market and borrowers generally.  Folk2Folk was launched in February this year and has already introduced £4 million of secured loans (£11 million if you include loans in place at launch).  Folk2Folk introduce loans largely to the business community starting from £25,000 and up to £1million, at interest rates typically of 7-9%.  Loans are secured by a first mortgage on property, other than the borrower’s home.

Loans introduced to date have gone towards projects such as house building, commercial leisure facilities and property acquisitions, together with various renewable projects.  The largest loan to date is £1 million.

One of the key attractions of Folk2Folk is the speed in which it can process and deliver loans, completing the process within 7-10 days from application.

Folk2Folk has uncovered a significant lender appetite and has recently embarked on a marketing strategy to locate a higher number of borrowers to satisfy lender requirements.

It is certainly a fascinating time for peer-to-peer lending platforms, which are quickly finding themselves able to fill some of the Funding Gap.

It really is a return to basic principles of lending and borrowing and its simplicity is part of the reason for its success.

RateSetter P2P returns

June 27th, 2013

There was a comment made on the P2P money blog recently from one of RateSetter's lenders.  Alex Gower, RateSetter's Marketing Director, asked if he could respond to this comment, which we were more than happy to facilitate.

I wanted to respond to the poster who commented upon the returns he was getting from RateSetter and explain the principles of how returns are calculated. The simple answer is that calculating P2P returns can be complex and sadly is not a straightforward exercise. I will do my best to explain:

This simplest example I can give you is the RateSetter One Year Bond – the last matched rate today was 3%.

If you invested £2,000 in the 1 Year Bond at 3% today, you would receive at the end of the one year term £2,060. We pay this amount gross to lenders, and it is their responsibility to pay tax on this (at the same rate they would with a bank savings account).

Interest is calculated and accrues each and every day the money is on loan according to the base rate (which you can see in the contract). The interest compounds up to create the 3% at the end of the term -  this is calculated in a similar way as an AER from a bank.

Our Monthly Access account works in the same way, with a 30 day contract – lenders are paid all the capital and accrued interest after 30 days, and you choose to continue to lend or withdraw.

RateSetter Lenders do not suffer the problem of bad debt in the same way as they do on other peer to peer platforms – RateSetter protects Lenders using a Provision Fund (, the concept we pioneered when we launched. It’s designed to ensure that peer to peer lending is as simple and safe as we can make it, and has over £1m in it to protect Lenders. The Provision Fund has ensured that every single lender has received every penny of capital and interest – the only P2P company to have achieved this.

So far, so (relatively) simple!

Where it becomes more confusing is with the longer term markets (3 Year Income and 5 Year Income). Unlike a savings account, these markets are amortizing – that is, the capital and interest is paid back in monthly instalments by the borrower. This is clearly different to a savings account – banks rarely force you to draw down your money…! This creates a challenge – the lender has to make a decision what to do with these repayments. We allow lenders to set “Reinvestments Settings” which decide what to do with these repayments – reinvest (at Your Rate or the Market Rate), reinvest in a different market, or withdraw the money. Similarly, you may receive “early repayments”: borrowers are allowed to repay some or all of their loan at any point during the term of the loan with no penalty. Whilst this is good for lenders (who get their money back), it means that the contract ends and needs to be replaced with a new one. These are treated in the same way as repayments according to the Reinvestment Settings.

Rates are calculated in the same way as the 1 Year Bond example, but - to give a fair comparison with an AER - assume that you will reinvest those monthly repayments at the same rate you originally lent at.

So the key point is: Rates are fixed to the contract, but the return is variable; it is dependent on the variation in terms that borrowers eventually take, and the variation in rates on the contracts you match whilst you are invested. So, to achieve quoted rates, the expectation is that you continually reinvest your money (at the same rate as the contract states) and achieve the compounding effect. This is how all P2P companies display their rates to overcome these quirks of peer to peer.

The key point is that you earn interest on money that is on loan: it’s a central principle of P2P that you only earn interest on what is on loan at any given time. So over time, you will end up with (probably hundreds of) different contracts earning differing rates, but knowing that whenever money is out on loan it is earning interest. You also have the comfort that all of your contracts are covered by the protection of the Provision Fund.

Calculating an accurate return therefore is not necessarily possible: the rates give a good guidance to what you are going to return but necessarily have to make assumptions about the future. We are however proud to say that we have returned lenders the capital and interest they have expected, and that has been reflected in the growth that we have seen.

Finally, the tax point is important to consider for those investing in p2p – we would always recommend that people take whatever tax efficient allowances they can, such as ISAs. The sad reality is that people quickly exhaust those allowances, and few options offer a similar return with as low a risk as lending on RateSetter. Our bad debt rates (absorbed by the fund) are exceptionally low (0.35% of funds matched) and tell the tale of an exhaustive and exceptionally cautious credit policy, which approves only 10% of people who apply for a loan.